Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39693266›Full record

SynthesisThe Gerontologist2025

People With Dementia Disclosing Their Diagnosis to Social Networks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

Gianna Kohl, Mauricio Molinari Ulate, Jem Bhatt, Jennifer Lynch, Katrina Scior, Georgina Charlesworth

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Gerontologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gianna KohlUCL Unit for Stigma Research, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8913-1247
Mauricio Molinari UlatePsycho-Sciences Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0616-7683
Jem BhattUCL Unit for Stigma Research, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7273-7234
Jennifer LynchSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2601-7498
Katrina SciorUCL Unit for Stigma Research, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-0090
Georgina CharlesworthUCL Unit for Stigma Research, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5278-1756

Funding

Marie Curie Innovative Training Network Action 813196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesGiven the stigma of dementia, individuals with the condition may be wary to disclose their diagnosis to other people, both in face-to-face and digital settings. While sharing one's dementia diagnosis with others is essential for accessing valuable support for social, cognitive, and physical well-being, this area of research has largely been neglected. In this meta-synthesis, we aimed to systematically review qualitative research on the factors associated with online and offline self-disclosure in people with dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted a systematic search in 6 electronic databases. Inclusion criteria comprised qualitative and mixed-methods studies describing experiences with self-disclosure in people with any type of dementia. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The meta-synthesis was conducted in NVivo using a thematic synthesis approach.

results28 studies were included. 3 analytical themes were generated: "Concealment," "Stigma and fear," and "Taking control," the latter 2 with subthemes. Findings from this review were corroborated with people with dementia and family carers as part of Patient and Public Involvement meetings. Our findings reveal that while stigma plays a pivotal role, people with dementia can take control of the meaning of their diagnosis through self-disclosure. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Self-disclosure is complex and multifaceted. People with dementia, particularly those experiencing stigma, can benefit from post-diagnostic support that encompasses resources and interventions for self-disclosure. Further research is required to investigate people with dementia's disclosure decision-making process.

Indexed as

DementiaSelf DisclosureSocial NetworkingSocial StigmaSocial SupportCaregiversHumansQualitative ResearchPersonal experiencesQualitative methodsSelf-disclosureStigmaWell-being

Identifiers

PMID39693266
PMCPMC11833486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.