Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39693192›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024

Scrutinizing the COVID-19 vaccine safety debate.

Khalid Bin Abdulrahman, Amro Bin Abdulrahman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khalid Bin AbdulrahmanDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-552X
Amro Bin AbdulrahmanPreventive Medicine, Second Cluster, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3014-0891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The controversy surrounding the safety of coronavirus disease-19 vaccinations is part of a larger historical backdrop of ongoing discussions regarding vaccine safety that have spanned several decades. The historical disputes around measles, mumps, rubella, and influenza highlight the recurring pattern in which public doubt is fueled by false information and personal stories. A 2024 multinational study in the journal

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinesimmunizationspatient safetyscientific debate

Identifiers

PMID39693192
PMCPMC11540079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.