Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39693114›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2024

The current state of the multidisciplinary heart team approach: a systematic review.

Arian Arjomandi Rad, Sebastian Streukens, Jindra Vainer, Thanos Athanasiou, Jos Maessen, Peyman Sardari Nia

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Association Between Interventional Cardiologist Practice Characteristics, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Use, and Clinical Outcomes.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arian Arjomandi RadDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4931-4049
Sebastian StreukensDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jindra VainerDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thanos AthanasiouDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2525-5515
Jos MaessenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peyman Sardari NiaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2296-1497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heart team (HT) approach, recommended for managing cardiovascular diseases, emphasizes multidisciplinary collaboration. Despite its potential benefits, evidence on its effectiveness and implementation is varied and sparse. This review assesses the HT approach's impact on patient outcomes and care delivery in cardiovascular care. A systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar up to July 2023, focusing on studies that implemented an HT approach in coronary and heart valve disease management. Exclusion criteria included non-human studies, case reports and studies not focusing on HT outcomes. From 6270 identified articles, 20 met the inclusion criteria. These studies demonstrated significant variability in HT composition and organization, coupled with a lack of standardized metrics for evaluating clinical outcomes and the impact of the HT. Significant variability was observed in HT composition, with 13 of the 20 studies did not utilize structured templates, those that did demonstrated more consistent decision-making. In mitral valve interventions, HTs were linked to reduced in-hospital mortality and improved long-term survival (5-year survival probability of 0.74 vs 0.70, P = 0.04). In aortic valve interventions, 80% of patients underwent tailored valve procedures following HT evaluation. The HT approach in cardiovascular care demonstrates improved patient outcomes, particularly in specialized interventions for mitral and aortic valve diseases and coronary artery disease management. Despite these positive findings, the variability in HT implementation and the need for standardized outcome metrics call for further advances to optimize this collaborative care model.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPatient Care TeamHumansAortic Valve InterventionsCardiovascular Diseases (CVDs)Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)Mitral Valve InterventionsMultidisciplinary Heart Team (HT)Standardized Outcome Metrics

Identifiers

PMID39693114
PMCPMC11754862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.