Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39692968›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of bipolar disorders2024

Machine learning-driven simplification of the hypomania checklist-32 for adolescent: a feature selection approach.

Guanghui Shen, Haoran Chen, Xinwu Ye, Xiaodong Xue, Shusi Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guanghui Shen *Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325800, China.
Haoran Chen *Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325800, China.
Xinwu YeWenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325800, China.
Xiaodong XueCangnan County People's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325800, China.
Shusi TangWenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325800, China. atss1985@163.com.

Funding

Science and Technology Plan Project of Wenzhou Municipality Y2023865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Hypomania Checklist-32 is widely used to screen for bipolar disorder, but its length can be challenging for adolescents with manic symptoms. This study aimed to develop a shortened version of the HCL-32 tailored for adolescents using machine learning techniques.

methodsData from 2,850 adolescents (mean age 15.50 years, 68.81% female) who completed the HCL-32 were analyzed. Random forest (RF) and gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithms were employed for feature selection. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine optimal cutoff points for the shortened scale.

resultsAn 8-item version of the HCL-32 was derived, maintaining high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.97). The selected items captured core symptoms of adolescent mania, including increased energy, risk-taking, and irritability. Two cutoff points were identified: a score of 3 offered high specificity (0.98) and positive predictive value (0.98), while a score of 4 provided balanced sensitivity (0.87) and specificity (0.94) with the highest overall accuracy (0.91).

conclusionsThe machine learning-driven 8-item version of the HCL-32 demonstrates strong diagnostic utility for adolescent bipolar disorder, offering a more efficient screening tool without sacrificing clinical sensitivity. This shortened scale may improve assessment feasibility and accuracy in clinical settings, addressing the unique challenges of diagnosing bipolar disorder in adolescents.

Indexed as

Feature selectionGradient boosting machineManic symptomsRandom forestScale reduction

Identifiers

PMID39692968
PMCPMC11655905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.