ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
Realization of high-end PET devices that assist conventional PET devices in improving image quality via diffusion modeling.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PET Image Reconstruction Using Deep Diffusion Image Prior.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Score-based generative diffusion models to synthesize full-dose FDG brain PET from MRI in epilepsy patients.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to implement high-end positron emission tomography (PET) equipment to assist conventional PET equipment in improving image quality via a distribution learning-based diffusion model.
methodsA diffusion model was first trained on a dataset of high-quality (HQ) images acquired by a high-end PET device (uEXPLORER scanner), and the quality of the conventional PET images was later improved on the basis of this trained model built on null-space constraints. Data from 180 patients were used in this study. Among them, 137 patients who underwent total-body PET/computed tomography scans via a uEXPLORER scanner at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively enrolled. The datasets of 50 of these patients were used to train the diffusion model. The remaining 87 cases and 43 PET images acquired from The Cancer Imaging Archive were used to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the proposed method. The nonlocal means (NLM) method, UNet and a generative adversarial network (GAN) were used as reference methods.
resultsThe incorporation of HQ imaging priors derived from high-end devices into the diffusion model through network training can enable the sharing of information between scanners, thereby pushing the limits of conventional scanners and improving their imaging quality. The quantitative results showed that the diffusion model based on null-space constraints produced better and more stable results than those of the methods based on NLM, UNet and the GAN and is well suited for cross-center and cross-device imaging.
conclusionA diffusion model based on null-space constraints is a flexible framework that can effectively utilize the prior information provided by high-end scanners to improve the image quality of conventional scanners in cross-center and cross-device scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.