Observational studyLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024
Low vs. conventional intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low pneumoperitoneum pressure facilitates postoperative pain relief and gastrointestinal function recovery in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy using IPTW-adjusted trifecta and pentafecta metrics.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLow intraabdominal pressure (IAP) during laparoscopy is associated with improved post-operative outcomes across a variety of surgical specialties. A prospective cohort study was undertaken to assess post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS) with low (8mmHg) versus conventional (15mmHg) IAP.
methodsA prospective real-world observational study of patients undergoing LCRS in a single-centre, between June 2020 and June 2023 was performed. Operative procedures for diverse colonic pathology such as diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and colorectal cancers (CRC) were included. The evaluated primary outcomes were post-operative pain, return of gastrointestinal motility, and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were the overall safety profile including intra- and post-operative complications and morbidity. Outcomes of interest were investigated using multivariate analysis.
resultsA total of 120 patients were included of which 69 (57.5%) were male. Median age and BMI of the cohort was 67 years (51-75 years) and 27 kg/m
conclusionLow IAP use during LCRS is feasible with a comparable safety profile to conventional laparoscopy. Intra-operative respiratory physiology is improved with reduced postoperative pain and analgesic requirement, and earlier time to pass flatus. Future rationally designed; well-powered, randomised trials are needed to understand the benefits of low intra-peritoneal pressure during laparoscopic colorectal resections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39692883What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.