ArticleProtoplasma2025
Deep learning-based cytoskeleton segmentation for accurate high-throughput measurement of cytoskeleton density.
Article in Protoplasma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytoskeletal dynamics in breast cancer: mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Review
- A novel attention mechanism for noise-adaptive and robust segmentation of microtubules in microscopy images.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Temporal changes in surface tension guide microtubule organization and accurate asymmetric division of Arabidopsis zygotes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Accessibility of the unstructured α-tubulin C-terminal tail is controlled by microtubule lattice conformation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Distinct actin microfilament localization during early cell plate formation through deep learning-based image restoration.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microscopic analyses of cytoskeleton organization are crucial for understanding various cellular activities, including cell proliferation and environmental responses in plants. Traditionally, assessments of cytoskeleton dynamics have been qualitative, relying on microscopy-assisted visual inspection. However, the transition to quantitative digital microscopy has introduced new technical challenges, with segmentation of cytoskeleton structures proving particularly demanding. In this study, we examined the utility of a deep learning-based segmentation method for accurate quantitative evaluation of cytoskeleton organization using confocal microscopic images of the cortical microtubules in tobacco BY-2 cells. The results showed that, although conventional methods sufficed for measurement of cytoskeleton angles and parallelness, the deep learning-based method significantly improved the accuracy of density measurements. To assess the versatility of the method, we extended our analysis to physiologically significant models in the context of changes in cytoskeleton density, namely Arabidopsis thaliana guard cells and zygotes. The deep learning-based method successfully improved the accuracy of cytoskeleton density measurements for quantitative evaluations of physiological changes in both stomatal movement in guard cells and intracellular polarization in elongating zygotes, confirming its utility in these applications. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of deep learning-based segmentation in providing precise and high-throughput measurements of cytoskeleton density, and has the potential to automate and expedite analyses of large-scale image datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39692866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.