ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
The deficiencies of epworth sleepiness scale in the evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea and related factors.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Daytime sleepiness estimated using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale during mandibular advancement device therapy for snoring and sleep apnea: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Trial
- Physiological and Sleep Profiles in Insomnia, OSA and COMISA: A Comparative Study in Portugal and Spain.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Persistent sleep disturbances after mild traumatic brain injury: A prospective multimodal assessment with actigraphy and hormonal biomarkers.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Obstructive sleep apnea in type 2 diabetes: prevalence and limitations of the Berlin questionnaire and Epworth sleepiness scale in identifying high-risk patients.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpworth Sleepiness Scale(ESS) is widely used in the assessment of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) despite certain deficiencies. It was aimed to evaluate the factors associated with low ESS scores in subjects investigated for OSA.
methodsIn this cross sectional study, we recorded the ESS and Pittsburg sleep quality index (PSQI) scores of patients undergoing polysomnography in our sleep center between November 2022-January 2023. Additional questions regarding literacy, vehicle use, driver licence and travelling habits were asked. Sleep indices of patients with AHI ≥ 5 were recorded following PSG.
results96 patients with mean age 51 ± 12, 68% male, median AHI 34.6 (7-105), ESS 7 (0-22), PSQI 9 (2-15) were included. Among moderate-severe OSA patients without EDS; 10% were illiterate, 67% performed reading only from cellular phone, 88% did not attend the social settings, 53% did not travel frequently and 40% did not use any vehicle. The listed factors were also associated with low ESS (p < 0.001). The sleep indices and PSQI scores of patient groups with and without EDS were similar. There was a correlation between ESS and total PSQI score (β = 0.31, p = 0.002) and subjective sleep quality (β = 0.21, p = 0.04), sleep disturbances (β = 0.29, p = 0.004) and daytime dysfunction (β = 0.49, p < 0.001) domains.
conclusionESS may be inadequate in the assessment of the demographical features and daily habits of patients from different sociocultural settings. Clinicians should be aware that the patients may have severe OSA and poor sleep quality despite low ESS scores and should evaluate each patient individually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39692847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.