Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39692817›Full record

Trial reportJournal of patient-reported outcomes2024

Impact of eptinezumab on work productivity beyond reductions in monthly migraine days: post hoc analysis of the DELIVER trial.

Piero Barbanti, Susanne F Awad, Heather Rae-Espinoza, Stephane A Regnier, Xin Ying Lee, Peter J Goadsby

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04418765 (Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04418765 phase3completednot on this map

Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments

TypeinterventionalSponsorH. Lundbeck A/SRan2020 to 2022Enrolled892ConditionsMigraineArmsEptinezumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Piero BarbantiHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy. piero.barbanti@sanraffaele.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5670-3755
Susanne F AwadH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Heather Rae-EspinozaClinigma, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stephane A RegnierH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Xin Ying LeeH. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter J GoadsbyNIHR King's Clinical Research Facility and Headache Group, King's College, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEptinezumab's impact on self-reported work productivity in adults with migraine and 2‒4 prior preventive migraine treatment failures is not fully understood. METHODOLOGY: Electronic diaries captured monthly migraine days (MMDs) reported by patients enrolled in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled DELIVER trial (NCT04418765). The migraine-specific Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, administered at baseline and each monthly visit, was a secondary outcome of DELIVER and used to model changes from baseline in self-reported monthly hours of absenteeism (decreased work attendance) and presenteeism (reduced work efficiency while at work with a migraine) in Canada, as the base case. Path analysis illustrated eptinezumab's impact on work productivity beyond MMDs.

resultsAs MMDs increased, monthly hours of absenteeism increased linearly while those of presenteeism increased quadratically. Best-fit models were improved after including an eptinezumab treatment effect, showing benefit over placebo after controlling for MMD frequency. Compared to placebo, patients treated with eptinezumab (pooled) had a modeled reduction from baseline of 7.2 h/month (absenteeism) (95% CI: -9.9, -4.5; P < 0.001) and 21.4 h/month (presenteeism) (95% CI: -26.3, -16.5; P < 0.001) over weeks 1‒24. Beyond MMD reductions, improvements in patient-identified most bothersome symptom (PI-MBS) and reductions in percent of severe migraine attacks contributed to eptinezumab's effect.

conclusionsEptinezumab decreased absenteeism and presenteeism based on patient reports, with data highlighting the importance of considering the PI-MBS. The greater change from baseline than placebo in self-reported absenteeism and presenteeism was only partly explained by changes in MMDs, presenting a potential opportunity to decrease the cost of migraine in the workplace.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04418765); EudraCT (Identifier: 2019-004497-25).

Indexed as

AbsenteeismEfficiencyMigraine DisordersAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCanadaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPresenteeismSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAbsenteeismEptinezumabMigrainePresenteeismWork productivity

Identifiers

PMID39692817
PMCPMC11655748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.