ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AQP1 Suppresses Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma via Epigenetic Silencing and TNF-Mediated Apoptosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo summarize the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) and to construct clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms using existing databases.
methodsClinical prognostic models were developed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, while molecular prognostic models were constructed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Cox regression and LASSO regression were employed to identify clinicopathological features and molecular markers related to prognosis. The accuracy of the prognostic models was assessed using ROC curves, C-index, decision curve analysis (DCA) curves, and calibration plots.
resultsIn the 2004-2015 SEER cohort, Cox regression analysis revealed that age, grade, AJCC stage, N stage, M stage, and surgery were independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in pRCC patients. ROC curves, C-index, and DCA curves indicated that the prognostic nomogram based on clinical independent predictors had better predictive ability than TNM staging and SEER staging. Additionally, in the TCGA cohort, M stage, clinical stage, and the molecular markers IDO1 and PLK1 were identified as independent risk factors. The prognostic nomogram based on molecular independent risk factors effectively predicted the 3-year and 5-year OS and CSS for pRCC patients.
conclusionsThe clinical and molecular nomograms constructed in this study provide robust predictive tools for individualized prognosis in pRCC patients, offering better accuracy than traditional staging systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.