Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39692800›Full record

Observational studyJournal of patient-reported outcomes2024

Assessing usability of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in older people with and without a rare dermatologic disorder.

Calvin N Ho, Anna Kündig, Lila Bahadori, Katy Roat, Rachel Bruce, Caroline P Goswami, Kimberly Kelly, Thomas Moll

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Calvin N HoPatient Centered Science, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. calvin.ho@astrazeneca.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3360-9651
Anna KündigPatient Centered Science, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lila BahadoriLate-stage Respiratory and Immunology, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Katy RoatPatient Centered Solutions, IQVIA, New York, NY, USA.
Rachel BrucePatient Centered Solutions, IQVIA, New York, NY, USA.
Caroline P GoswamiPatient Centered Solutions, IQVIA, New York, NY, USA.
Kimberly KellyPatient Centered Solutions, IQVIA, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas MolleCOA Science, Clario, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobust and well-defined data collection is important when using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in clinical studies. Questions have been raised as to whether older age may be a barrier to data collection due to patients' unfamiliarity with electronic devices. Older adults may also have underlying health conditions that affect their ability to fill out patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on electronic devices. The aim of this observational, qualitative research study was to evaluate the usability of electronic PROMs (ePROMs) on a tablet and smartphone in older participants with and without bullous pemphigoid (BP).

methodsOlder people with and without BP were recruited in the US and France. They participated in 60-min in-person interviews, with moderators observing their completion of various tasks, including ePROMs, using a tablet and smartphone. Participants were scored on ease of task completion using a scale from 1 to 5.

resultsA total of 12 participants were recruited (≥65 years old; six each with and without BP [all participants without BP were ≥75 years old]). Most participants (83%) could easily and confidently perform most assigned tasks on both the tablet and smartphone. Although select tasks required assistance, all participants were eventually able to complete all tasks. Overall, ePROM usability did not correlate with age, sex, country, or disease state. Feedback on the general usability of both electronic devices was largely positive, and most participants (n = 11; 92%) were willing to use them. Participants were generally pleased with the training modules offered on both devices, describing the training as sufficient, straightforward, and helpful. In total, 25 usability issues were identified, which fell into three categories: incomplete instructions, unclear language, and insufficient technical/visual design. Participants provided feedback on how to enhance device usability.

conclusionsThe results suggest that older people can confidently use a tablet or smartphone for ePROM completion, particularly with appropriate training. ePROMs should be designed with the needs of the target patient population in mind. These results can be leveraged to improve clinical data recording, optimize device usability, and enhance the user experience for older people and those with functional or physical limitations.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSmartphoneAgedAged, 80 and overComputers, HandheldFemaleFranceHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchUnited StatesBullous pemphigoidData collection methodseCOAElderlyElectronic clinical outcome assessmentElectronic patient-reported outcome measureePROMOlder adultsPatient-reported outcomesUser experience

Identifiers

PMID39692800
PMCPMC11655768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.