ArticleCurrent microbiology2024
Occurrence, Multidrug Resistance, SCCmec Typing of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Farmed Eggs and Environment.
Article in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on farmed eggs (n: 480) and environmental samples (n: 72; feed, water, and poultry droppings) from twenty-four deep litter and caged poultry layer farms across Punjab, India. The study noted a significantly higher occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus (31.67%; 95% CI 26.37-36.96%) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (32.5%, 95% CI 23-43.3%) in deep litter farms (P < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis revealed while the odds of presumptive MRSA from egg isolates were high (Odds ratio: 2.714; 95% CI 1.172, 6.284) in deep litter, conversely, resistance against ceftriaxone (0.279; 95% CI 0.129, 0.605), tetracycline (0.227; 95% CI 0.104, 0.497), and erythromycin (0.46; 95% CI 0.218, 0.973) was low. The multi-drug resistance was high and nearly equal; 68.53%, and 72.22% in deep litter and cage systems respectively. Additionally, around 89.65% and 77.7% of MRSA from deep litter and cage systems had multiple antibiotic resistance index > 0.2 respectively. Among the resistance genes under study, the odds of mecA and tetL were 2.417 and 8.029 times higher in deep litter. The hierarchical clustering of MRSA isolates based on the antibiogram profile depicted the formation of a large number of cluster solutions with a mix of isolates from both systems. The SCCmec typing revealed a predominance of type V in both the systems (34.4%; deep litter and 33.3%; cage), with a scarce distribution of other types and subtypes viz., deep litter: types III; 13.7%, IVc; 6.8%, II; 6.8%, IVa, and IVb; 3.4% and cage system: types III and IVc; 11.1%. To, the best of our knowledge current study is the first-ever comprehensive study on comparative occurrence, AMR profile, molecular characterization, and typing of MRSA from farmed eggs and environment from India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39692784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.