ReviewAnnals of hematology2025
Clinical outcomes and safety of CAR-T cells in treatment of T-Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CD7 CAR-T Cell as Bridging Therapy for Successful Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory T Lymphoblastic Leukemia/ Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.The American journal of case reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Research progress on chimeric antigen receptor-based immunotherapy against autoimmune diseases.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Venetoclax and azacitidine in combination with homoharringtonine, cytarabine, and aclarubicin for salvage therapy of relapsed/refractory T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.International journal of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relapsed or refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (r/r T-ALL/LBL) are frequently aggressive and associated with unfavorable prognoses. Pan-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have shown promising results in clinical trials. In recent years, CD7 CAR T-cell and CD5 CAR T-cell demonstrate effectiveness in treating r/r T-ALL/LBL patients with bone marrow infiltration. However, nearly half of r/r T-ALL/T-LBL patients are accompanied by extramedullary disease (EMD), where comprehensive data on the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy remain limited. Additionally, CD7 CAR T-cell and CD5 CAR T-cell therapy can cause severe immunodeficiency and hematologic toxicity, complicating with difficult immune reconstitution. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the safety profile and adverse events associated with CAR T-cell therapy in r/r T-ALL/LBL, with a a particular emphasis on its impact in patients with EMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39692783What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.