ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Feasibility/clinical utility of half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging combined with deep learning reconstruction in gynecologic magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning reconstruction of diffusion-weighted imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging in endometrial cancer: a comparison with multi-shot echo-planar imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen antispasmodics are unavailable, the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER; called BLADE by Siemens Healthineers) or half Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) is clinically used in gynecologic MRI. However, their imaging qualities are limited compared to Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) with antispasmodics. Even with antispasmodics, TSE can be artifact-affected, necessitating a rapid backup sequence. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the utility of HASTE with deep learning reconstruction and variable flip angle evolution (iHASTE) compared to conventional sequences with and without antispasmodics. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included MRI scans without antispasmodics for 79 patients who underwent iHASTE, HASTE, and BLADE and MRI scans with antispasmodics for 79 case-control matched patients who underwent TSE. Three radiologists qualitatively evaluated image quality, robustness to artifacts, tissue contrast, and uterine lesion margins. Tissue contrast was also quantitatively evaluated.
resultsQuantitative evaluations revealed that iHASTE exhibited significantly superior tissue contrast to HASTE and BLADE. Qualitative evaluations indicated that iHASTE outperformed HASTE in overall quality. Two of three radiologists judged iHASTE to be significantly superior to BLADE, while two of three judged TSE to be significantly superior to iHASTE. iHASTE demonstrated greater robustness to artifacts than both BLADE and TSE. Lesion margins in iHASTE had lower scores than BLADE and TSE.
conclusioniHASTE is a viable clinical option in patients undergoing gynecologic MRI with anti-spasmodics. iHASTE may also be considered as a useful add-on sequence in patients undergoing MRI with antispasmodics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39692759What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.