Observational studyCancer medicine2024
Real-World Prevalence, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes for Patients With HER2 (ERBB2)-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, From a US-Based Clinico-Genomic Database.
Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- HER2 Alterations in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: Biology, Therapeutic Landscape, and Emerging Precision Approaches.Cancers · 2026Review
- Real-World Patient Characteristics, Mutational Landscape, and Outcomes in Advanced/MetastaticJCO precision oncology · 2026Observational
- Retrospective Analysis of HER2 Testing, Treatment Patterns, and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC With HER2 Mutations in France.Cancer medicine · 2026Observational
- Epidemiology and Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer by Region: A Targeted Literature Review.Targeted oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTargeted therapies have been shown to improve outcomes in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with driver mutations. We evaluated the real-world prevalence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; ERBB2) tumor gene mutations among patients with mNSCLC and described historical treatments and outcomes in patients with HER2-mutant mNSCLC, during a period when there was no approved targeted therapy for HER2-mutant mNSCLC. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective observational study used a US nationwide de-identified NSCLC clinico-genomic database. Eligible patients were adults diagnosed with HER2-mutant mNSCLC from January 2014 to July 2021 without co-occuring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tumor mutations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize prevalence, baseline characteristics and treatment patterns. Clinical outcomes were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analyses.
resultsAmong 9206 patients with mNSCLC, 164 (1.78%) met the eligibility criteria (mean age: 67.3 years, 63.4% White, 56.7% female, and 53.0% with a smoking history). 132/164 (80.5%) had at least one line of treatment. Platinum-based chemotherapy (45.5%) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) with chemotherapy (28.0%) were the most frequently used first-line treatments. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) real-world (rw) progression-free survival in first-line was 5.5 (4.8, 6.2) months and 3.0 (2.3, 4.2) months in second-line. The median rw overall survival in first-line was 13.2 (10.6, 18.4) months and 8.2 (6.6, 13.2) months in second-line.
conclusionDuring this study period, the most common regimens were platinum-based chemotherapy with or without ICI in first and second line, and median rwOS was 13.2 and 8.2 months, respectively. These results indicate the need for more effective targeted therapies in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.