Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39692586›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Articulatory-kinematic changes in speech following surgical treatment for oral or oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review.

Thomas B Tienkamp, Teja Rebernik, Rachel A D'Cruz, Rob J J H van Son, Martijn Wieling, Max J H Witjes, Sebastiaan A H J de Visscher, Defne Abur

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas B TienkampCentre for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-6654
Teja RebernikCentre for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1986-8470
Rachel A D'CruzCentre for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Rob J J H van SonNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-7635
Martijn WielingCentre for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0434-1526
Max J H WitjesDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-3246
Sebastiaan A H J de VisscherDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-5427
Defne AburCentre for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0410-8487

Funding

Atos MedicalRijksuniversiteit Groningen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment for oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (O&OSCC) often leads to problems with speech articulation. Articulatory-kinematic data may be especially informative in designing new therapeutic approaches for individuals treated for these tumours.

aimsTo provide a systematic review of the literature assessing the articulatory-kinematic consequences of oral and oropharyngeal cancer treatment. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycInfo) were used to identify studies that used kinematic methods to characterize the speech of individuals treated for O&OSCC. Risk of bias was assessed using the critical appraisal checklist from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were synthesized using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis guidelines. OUTCOMES &

resultsIn total, 29 studies with a total of 197 individuals treated for O&OSCC were included. In most studies the risk of bias was moderate to high and certainty of evidence was very low to low. Results showed both global changes (i.e., reduced movement and increased asymmetry of the tongue) as well as more local changes (i.e., reduced palatal contact and more centralized productions of consonants) following treatment for O&OSCC. Generally, reported changes were related to tumour size and location. Smaller tumours resulted in better or more typical articulatory-kinematic speech outcomes. Articulatory movements were most reduced in the affected region of the tongue as compared with neighbouring parts. Study findings were limited to small sample sizes with generally minimal descriptions of patient characteristics. No study assessed the influence of primary radiation treatment or adjuvant radiation therapy on kinematic speech outcomes. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Based on the literature to date, surgical treatment for O&OSCC seems to reduce articulatory-kinematics of speech, and post-treatment outcomes may be partially explained by tumour size and location. The absence of studies assessing the effect of primary or adjuvant radiation therapy on articulatory-kinematics limits our knowledge of how these interventions influence post-treatment kinematic speech outcomes. Future studies should provide detailed patient descriptions and develop standardized speech assessment tools in order to further our knowledge regarding articulatory-kinematic speech changes following treatment, and to move towards the development of active rehabilitation strategies for those with O&OSCC. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Treatment for O&OSCC can result in problems with speech articulation. Speech outcomes for O&OSCC are highly variable. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge We systematically reviewed and synthesized the literature on articulatory-kinematic changes following O&OSCC treatment and identified 29 related studies. Treatment for O&OSCC resulted in global (i.e., more asymmetrical or reduced movement patterns) and local (i.e., reduced palatal contact) articulatory-kinematic changes. In general, smaller tumours resulted in better or more typical articulatory-kinematic speech outcomes as compared with larger tumours. Articulatory movements were most reduced in the affected region of the tongue as compared with neighbouring parts. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Understanding articulatory-kinematic impacts of surgical intervention for O&OSCC can guide (the development of) tailored speech rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Mouth NeoplasmsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsArticulation DisordersBiomechanical PhenomenaCarcinoma, Squamous CellHumansSpeecharticulationarticulatory–kinematicsoral and oropharyngeal cancerspeech

Identifiers

PMID39692586
PMCPMC11654356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.