ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2025
Impact of Anti-CD4 Autoantibodies on Immune Reconstitution in People With Advanced HIV.
Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Delayed Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation on Anti-CD4 Autoantibodies in Antiretroviral Therapy-Naive People With HIV.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Systemic translocation ofJournal of virology · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Onychomycosis and HIV: A Systematic Review.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comprehensive approach to primary immunodeficiencies in adulthood: recognition and diagnosis.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025Review
- Immunomodulatory biomaterials in HIV-1 infection prevention, control and treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART), 15%-30% of people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) experience a limited recovery of CD4 T cells. Although autoantibodies against the CD4 receptor have previously been identified in people with HIV (PWH), little is known about their longitudinal impact on CD4 T-cell reconstitution.
methodsAnti-CD4 autoantibodies were evaluated by the fluid-phase luciferase immunoprecipitation systems immunoassay in ART-naive people with advanced HIV (CD4 count ≤100 cells/µL), PWH with CD4 count >200 cells/µL, long-term nonprogressors, people with idiopathic CD4 lymphopenia, people with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, and healthy volunteers without HIV. In the participants with advanced HIV, we assessed the association of anti-CD4 autoantibodies at ART initiation with CD4 recovery over a median follow-up of 192 weeks.
resultsAnti-CD4 autoantibodies were identified in 29% (61/210) of ART-naive participants with advanced HIV but were absent in people without HIV. Female PWH showed a 4-fold higher prevalence (P < .001) of anti-CD4 autoantibodies compared to males. After ART initiation, people with advanced HIV with anti-CD4 autoantibodies exhibited an overall slower rate of CD4 reconstitution (5.8 vs 6.6 cells/µL/month, P = .007) and lower week 192 CD4 count (268 vs 355 cells/µL, P = .037). Incidental, clinically indicated immunosuppressive therapy in these participants was associated with an improved rate of CD4 reconstitution (P = .0019) and higher week 192 CD4 count (551 vs 268 cells/µL, P = .019).
conclusionsPeople with advanced HIV harboring anti-CD4 autoantibodies at ART initiation demonstrated a slower rate and extent of CD4 reconstitution after 4 years. Incidental immunosuppressive therapy was associated with increased CD4 counts in these participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.