ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Heterogeneous graph contrastive learning with gradient balance for drug repositioning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Laboratory to Patient Access: A Scoping Review of the Multi-Dimensional Challenges in Drug Repurposing.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Analysis of the interaction network relationship between drugs using a graph neural network.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Enhanced drug-disease association prediction through representation learning on similarity networks.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Article
- Disentangled contrastive learning with dynamic intent adaptation for unveiling gene-drug associations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- MVSGDR: multi-view stacked graph convolutional network for drug repositioning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Urinary based biomarkers identification and genetic profiling in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of metabolomic studies.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug repositioning, which involves identifying new therapeutic indications for approved drugs, is pivotal in accelerating drug discovery. Recently, to mitigate the effect of label sparsity on inferring potential drug-disease associations (DDAs), graph contrastive learning (GCL) has emerged as a promising paradigm to supplement high-quality self-supervised signals through designing auxiliary tasks, then transfer shareable knowledge to main task, i.e. DDA prediction. However, existing approaches still encounter two limitations. The first is how to generate augmented views for fully capturing higher-order interaction semantics. The second is the optimization imbalance issue between auxiliary and main tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel heterogeneous Graph Contrastive learning method with Gradient Balance for DDA prediction, namely GCGB. To handle the first challenge, a fusion view is introduced to integrate both semantic views (drug and disease similarity networks) and interaction view (heterogeneous biomedical network). Next, inter-view contrastive learning auxiliary tasks are designed to contrast the fusion view with semantic and interaction views, respectively. For the second challenge, we adaptively adjust the gradient of GCL auxiliary tasks from the perspective of gradient direction and magnitude for better guiding parameter update toward main task. Extensive experiments conducted on three benchmarks under 10-fold cross-validation demonstrate the model effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.