Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39692295›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2025

How Women and Men with Parkinson's Disease Approach Decision-Making for Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

Michelle E Fullard, Ashley Dafoe, Erika Shelton, Drew S Kern, Dan D Matlock, Megan A Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychiatric consultation outcomes in deep brain stimulation candidacy: clinical and psychosocial correlates from a retrospective cohort.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Refractory Motor Complications: Towards a Pragmatic Definition.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michelle E FullardDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Ashley DafoeAdult & Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Erika SheltonDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Drew S KernDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7317-3787
Dan D MatlockDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Megan A MorrisAdult & Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

The Colorado Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health ProgramK12AR084226 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JUDITH G. REGENSTEINER, Nanette F. Santoro · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
Improving Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: Parkinson's Disease as a ModelK76AG083349 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Michelle Erin Fullard · 2024 to 2026
$728k
Davis Phinney FoundationNIAMS NIH HHS BIRCWH K12 NIAM SD/K12AR084226NIAMS NIH HHS K12 AR084226NIA NIH HHS K76 AG083349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen make up only 23% to 30% of recipients for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD), a discrepancy that is not accounted for by differences in disease incidence. One of the many factors that may contribute to this gap includes gender differences in decision-making.

objectiveThe aim was to explore how women and men approach the decision for DBS in terms of informational needs, weighing risks and benefits, and decision-making.

methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 33 participants with PD who had undergone DBS evaluation within the past 3 years. Data were analyzed using content analysis.

resultsSixteen women and 17 men participated in interviews. We identified 4 key themes. First, information sources were similar between women and men, and they valued hearing personal experiences. Second, the motivations for DBS surgery were often very personal. Third, the decision-making process occurred over time, sometimes years. Fourth, although many expressed fear of brain surgery, trust in the surgeon helped many overcome this fear. Women overall had less support than men during decision-making and after surgery. Women also placed greater value on talking to other women who had undergone DBS, although they had a hard time finding these women. Men, on the contrary, were less often worried about support and valued numerical information when weighing risks and benefits.

conclusionWe found gender differences in information needs, support, motivating factors, and how patients weighed risks and benefits. These differences can be used to inform educational tools and counseling for DBS.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDeep Brain StimulationParkinson DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Ageddeep brain stimulationgender differencesParkinson's diseaseshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID39692295
PMCPMC11998699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.