Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39692266›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2025

Optimal Combination of Different Selection and Mating Strategies on Exploiting Genetic Diversity and Genetic Gain in Small Pig Conservation Populations.

Qingbo Zhao, Huiming Liu, Qian Zhang, Qamar Raza Qadri, Yuchun Pan, Guosheng Su, Pinghua Li, Ruihua Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qingbo ZhaoKey Laboratory (Nanjing) for Evaluation and Utilization of Pigs Resources, College of Animal Science & Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5423-1029
Huiming LiuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Qian ZhangKey Laboratory (Nanjing) for Evaluation and Utilization of Pigs Resources, College of Animal Science & Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Qamar Raza QadriDepartment of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yuchun PanDepartment of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1163-5963
Guosheng SuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Pinghua LiKey Laboratory (Nanjing) for Evaluation and Utilization of Pigs Resources, College of Animal Science & Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2148-2435
Ruihua HuangKey Laboratory (Nanjing) for Evaluation and Utilization of Pigs Resources, College of Animal Science & Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-2271

Funding

Jiangsu Funding Program for Excellent Postdoctoral TalentJiangsu Seed Industry Revitalization Project JBGS[2021]024Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF 2024M751448STI 2030 - Major Projects 2023ZD04045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both selection and mating systems are essential tools for breeders to conserve the genetic variance and improve the performance of livestock animals. How to effectively balance the genetic gain and inbreeding has always been an important issue in quantitative genetics research. In this study, a total of 11 selection methods, including random and truncation selection, six conventional selection methods, three different optimal contribution selection (OCS) methods and three mating strategies including random mating, minimum-coancestry mating based on pedigree (MCPed) and genomic information (MCmarker), were performed using stochastic simulations. The long-term effects of different combinations of selection and mating strategies on the genetic gain, the rate of inbreeding and genetic diversity in the small-scale pig conservation populations were investigated. The results showed that different strategies of selection and mating methods had different effects on genetic gain and inbreeding rate. For maintaining additive genetic variance, the optimal strategy was random selection with random mating, followed by SIREhalf-DAMfullRandom selection (which means selecting dams randomly from each full-sib family) and random mating. For mainting the number of common ancestors, the optimal strategy was SIREhalf-DAMfull selection (which means selecting dams with the highest estimated breeding value within each full-sib family) and random mating, followed by SIREhalf-DAMfullRandom selection and random mating, OCS and MCPed mating. For genetic diversity metrics, taking He and Ho as an example, the optimal strategy was GOCS (optimal contribution selection based on genomic information) with MCmarker mating. For genetic gain, the optimal strategy was truncation selection and MCmarker mating, followed by POCS (optimal contribution selection based on pedigree information) and MCmarker mating, truncation selection and MCPed mating. For the rate of inbreeding, the optimal strategy was SIREhalf-DAMfull selection and MCPed mating. Our findings can help breeding managers and farmers choose a more suitable and sustainable strategy for maintaining the genetic diversity and improving the genetic gain of local pig breeds.

Indexed as

BreedingConservation of Natural ResourcesGenetic VariationSelection, GeneticAnimalsFemaleInbreedingMaleModels, GeneticPedigreeSwineadditive genetic varianceconservationlong‐term selectionmating strategyoptimal contribution selection

Identifiers

PMID39692266
PMCPMC12149481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.