Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39692189›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Optimising Exome Captures in Species With Large Genomes Using Species-Specific Repetitive DNA Blocker.

Robert Kesälahti, Timo A Kumpula, Sandra Cervantes, Sonja T Kujala, Tiina M Mattila, Jaakko S Tyrmi, Alina K Niskanen, Pasi Rastas, Outi Savolainen, Tanja Pyhäjärvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert KesälahtiDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2694-7302
Timo A KumpulaDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-8929
Sandra CervantesDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-5784
Sonja T KujalaNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0949-6156
Tiina M MattilaDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1298-7370
Jaakko S TyrmiDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4757-6563
Alina K NiskanenDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2017-2718
Pasi RastasInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2768-1339
Outi SavolainenDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Tanja PyhäjärviDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-5172

Funding

Emil Aaltosen SäätiöProcogen Horizon 289841Research Council of Finland 287431Research Council of Finland 309978Research Council of Finland 319313Research Council of Finland 343656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large and highly repetitive genomes are common. However, research interests usually lie within the non-repetitive parts of the genome, as they are more likely functional, and can be used to answer questions related to adaptation, selection and evolutionary history. Exome capture is a cost-effective method for providing sequencing data from protein-coding parts of the genes. C0t-1 DNA blockers consist of repetitive DNA and are used in exome captures to prevent the hybridisation of repetitive DNA sequences to capture baits or bait-bound genomic DNA. Universal blockers target repetitive regions shared by many species, while species-specific c0t-1 DNA is prepared from the DNA of the studied species, thus perfectly matching the repetitive DNA contents of the species. So far, the use of species-specific c0t-1 DNA has been limited to a few model species. Here, we evaluated the performance of blocker treatments in exome captures of Pinus sylvestris, a widely distributed conifer species with a large (> 20 Gbp) and highly repetitive genome. We compared treatment with a commercial universal blocker to treatments with species-specific c0t-1 (30,000 and 60,000 ng). Species-specific c0t-1 captured more unique exons than the initial set of targets leading to increased SNP discovery and reduced sequencing of tandem repeats compared to the universal blocker. Based on our results, we recommend optimising exome captures using at least 60,000 ng of species-specific c0t-1 DNA. It is relatively easy and fast to prepare and can also be used with existing bait set designs.

Indexed as

DNA, PlantExomeGenome, PlantGenomicsPinusRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityDNA, Plantc0t‐1 DNAconiferexome capturelarge genomePinus sylvestrisrepetitive DNA

Identifiers

PMID39692189
PMCPMC11887611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.