ReviewBiotechnology journal2024
Advancements in Plant Gene Editing Technology: From Construct Design to Enhanced Transformation Efficiency.
Review in Biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-Cas systems for enhancing chilling tolerance in rice: recent advances and future prospects.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Plant Immunometabolism: Metabolic Reprogramming Linking Developmental Signaling and Defense Metabolites.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Smart nanosystems for disease-resistant potatoes: a new Frontier in nanobiotechnology.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Article
- Introgression of wild barley alleles improves seedlings salinity tolerance in the nested association mapping HEB-400 population.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Genomic advances in orphan and underutilized Brassicaceae crops and their wild relatives.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Epigenetic Regulation of Salt Stress Responses in Rice: Mechanisms and Prospects for Enhancing Tolerance.Epigenomes · 2025Review
- Exploration of Comprehensive Structural and Functional Potential of Recombinant Proteins Using Cutting-Edge Bioinformatics Tools.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Genome Editing by Grafting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bioengineered poplar fibres via PagGLR2.8 editing: A synergistic design for high-performance biocomposites.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant gene editing technology has significantly advanced in recent years, thereby transforming both biotechnological research and agricultural practices. This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent advancements in this rapidly evolving field, showcasing significant discoveries from improved transformation efficiency to advanced construct design. The primary focus is on the maturation of the Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas)9 system, which has emerged as a powerful tool for precise gene editing in plants. Through a detailed exploration, we elucidate the intricacies of integrating genetic modifications into plant genomes, shedding light on transport mechanisms, transformation techniques, and optimization strategies specific to CRISPR constructs. Furthermore, we explore the initiatives aimed at extending the frontiers of gene editing to nonmodel plant species, showcasing the growing scope of this technology. Overall, this comprehensive review highlights the significant impact of recent advancements in plant gene editing, illuminating its transformative potential in driving agricultural innovation and biotechnological progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.