ArticleJACC. Case reports2024
3 Leadless Pacemaker Implantations in an 81-Year-Old Woman With a History of Transvenous Pacemaker Infection.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical interaction between sequential Micra devices resolved by programming alone: a case of premature battery depletion in a 91-year-old patient.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Electroanatomical mapping-guided leadless pacemaker (MICRA-VR) implantation in the right atrium of a univentricular heart with Fontan circulation, an approach combining imaging and electrophysiology: insights from a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leadless pacemakers (LPMs) offer an alternative for patients with challenging venous access or device infection history. Management of LPM battery depletion in frail patients presents unique challenges. We present the case of an 81-year-old frail woman with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and complete heart block, previously treated with percutaneous transseptal myocardial ablation and a transvenous pacemaker, who received an LPM after device extraction for infection. On battery depletion, a second LPM was implanted but dislodged, thus necessitating extraction attempts. Given the high extraction risks, a third LPM was successfully implanted. This case highlights the feasibility of multiple LPM implantations in complex cardiac patients and demonstrates that a third LPM can be a viable option when extraction risks are high. This approach expands management options for frail patients with complex cardiac histories who are unsuitable candidates for traditional pacing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.