Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691865›Full record

ReviewSAGE open medicine2024

Estimating surgical blood loss: A review of current strategies in various clinical settings.

Alexander D Stoker, Will J Binder, Peter E Frasco, Steven T Morozowich, Layne M Bettini, Andrew W Murray, Megan K Fah, Andrew W Gorlin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Blood Loss in Open Spine Surgeries - Preoperative Estimate vs Reality].Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spine surgery and major blood loss: how accurate is suction canister estimation?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Influence of etamsylate on coagulation parameters in dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The untransfusable patient.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Prospective Analysis of Viscoelastic Assays, Platelet Aggregometry, and Standard Laboratory Tests in Predicting Perioperative Blood Loss in Cardiac Surgery.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander D StokerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1305-6049
Will J BinderDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-5543
Peter E FrascoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Steven T MorozowichDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Layne M BettiniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Andrew W MurrayDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Megan K FahDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Andrew W GorlinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estimation of surgical blood loss is routinely performed during and after surgical procedures and has morbidity and mortality implications related to the risk of under- and over-resuscitation. The strategies for estimating surgical blood loss include visual estimation, the gravimetric method, the colorimetric method, formula-based methods, and other techniques (e.g., cell salvage). Currently, visual estimation continues to be the most widely used technique. In addition, unique considerations exist when these techniques are applied to various clinical settings such as massive transfusion, cardiac surgery, and obstetrics. Ultimately, when using estimated surgical blood loss to guide perioperative fluid management and transfusion thresholds, it is also important to mitigate the risks associated with resuscitation by targeting a goal-directed fluid therapy approach by utilizing markers of fluid-responsiveness to optimize stroke volume (cardiac output) and delivery of oxygen.

Indexed as

Estimated blood lossgoal-directed fluid therapymethods of blood loss estimationresuscitationsurgical blood loss

Identifiers

PMID39691865
PMCPMC11650593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.