ReviewJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Microbial flora surrounding orthodontic temporary skeletal anchorage devices: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The oral cavity harbours distinct microorganisms, which create a unique microenvironment. These microorganisms might trigger inflammatory reactions in the host, potentially leading to inflammation that can question the stability of temporary skeletal anchorage devices(TSADs). This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the type of microorganisms around TSADs. Methods: A search of studies in six electronic databases - Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, Scopus, LILACS and Web of Science were performed until 30 May 2024 without any restriction in date or language of publication. The selection of articles was limited to studies evaluating the microorganisms around TSADs during orthodontic treatment. Two reviewers independently performed eligibility screening, study selection, and data extraction. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the Risk of bias in all the included studies. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the heterogeneity of the studies. Results: From 7020 articles, seven prospective studies were included for the qualitative analysis. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola were found around all TSADs used in orthodontic therapy. There was a significant difference in the type of microorganisms around successful and failed TSADs. Conclusions: There was an overall colonization of diverse microorganisms around TSADS. Failed TSADs showed greater Porphyromonas gingivalis, Parvimonas micra and facultative anaerobic enteric commensal Enterobacter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.