ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
Artificial Intelligence-Based Classification of Anatomical Sites in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Images.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04384575 (Study on the Effectiveness of Gastroscope Operation Quality Control Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study on the Effectiveness of Gastroscope Operation Quality Control Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional decision support by artificial intelligence across the full workflow of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in screening and medical imaging of precancerous gastric diseases.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology Training (2005-2025): Trends, Tools, and Challenges.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current evidence and future directions.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A full examination of gastrointestinal tract is an essential prerequisite for effectively detecting gastrointestinal lesions. However, there is a lack of efficient tools to analyze and recognize gastric anatomy locations, preventing the complete portrayal of entire stomach. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in identifying gastric anatomy sites by analyzing esophagogastroduodenoscopy images. Methods: Using endoscopic images, we proposed a system called the Artificial Intelligence of Medicine (AIMED) through convolutional neural networks and MobileNetV3-large. The performance of artificial intelligence in the recognition of anatomic sites in esophagogastroduodenoscopy images was evaluated by considering many cases. Primary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: A total of 160,308 images from 27 categories of the upper endoscopy anatomy classification were included in this retrospective research. As a test group, 16031 esophagogastroduodenoscopy images with 27 categories were used to evaluate AIMED's performance in identifying gastric anatomy sites. The convolutional neural network's accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were determined to be 99.40%, 91.85%, and 99.69%, respectively. Conclusion: The AIMED system achieved high accuracy with regard to recognizing gastric anatomy sites, and it could assist the operator in enhancing the quality control of the used endoscope. Moreover, it could contribute to a more standardized endoscopic performance. Overall, our findings prove that artificial-intelligence-based systems can be indispensable to the endoscopic revolution (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04384575 (12/05/2020)).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.