Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691834›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024

Artificial Intelligence-Based Classification of Anatomical Sites in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Images.

Peng Yuan, Zhong-Hua Ma, Yan Yan, Shi-Jie Li, Jing Wang, Qi Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04384575 (Study on the Effectiveness of Gastroscope Operation Quality Control Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04384575 completednot on this map

Study on the Effectiveness of Gastroscope Operation Quality Control Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology

TypeobservationalSponsorPeking UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled1,570ConditionsGastric CancerArmsblind spots
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peng Yuan *State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Endoscopy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Zhong-Hua Ma *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Endoscopy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Yan Yan *State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Endoscopy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Shi-Jie LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Endoscopy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Jing WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Endoscopy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
Qi WuState Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Endoscopy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A full examination of gastrointestinal tract is an essential prerequisite for effectively detecting gastrointestinal lesions. However, there is a lack of efficient tools to analyze and recognize gastric anatomy locations, preventing the complete portrayal of entire stomach. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in identifying gastric anatomy sites by analyzing esophagogastroduodenoscopy images. Methods: Using endoscopic images, we proposed a system called the Artificial Intelligence of Medicine (AIMED) through convolutional neural networks and MobileNetV3-large. The performance of artificial intelligence in the recognition of anatomic sites in esophagogastroduodenoscopy images was evaluated by considering many cases. Primary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: A total of 160,308 images from 27 categories of the upper endoscopy anatomy classification were included in this retrospective research. As a test group, 16031 esophagogastroduodenoscopy images with 27 categories were used to evaluate AIMED's performance in identifying gastric anatomy sites. The convolutional neural network's accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were determined to be 99.40%, 91.85%, and 99.69%, respectively. Conclusion: The AIMED system achieved high accuracy with regard to recognizing gastric anatomy sites, and it could assist the operator in enhancing the quality control of the used endoscope. Moreover, it could contribute to a more standardized endoscopic performance. Overall, our findings prove that artificial-intelligence-based systems can be indispensable to the endoscopic revolution (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04384575 (12/05/2020)).

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networkesophagogastroduodenoscopyquality control

Identifiers

PMID39691834
PMCPMC11649499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.