ArticleMethodsX2024
A combined DEAV-BWM approach for effective evaluation and ranking of biomass materials in charcoal briquette production.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utilization of agricultural waste for producing charcoal briquettes is gaining significant attention as a sustainable alternative energy source. Converting these residues into charcoal briquettes not only addresses energy shortages but also provides an efficient solution for managing agricultural waste, contributing to environmental sustainability. This study proposes a novel methodology integrating a Data Envelopment Analysis Variant (DEAV) with the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to assess and rank biomass materials for charcoal briquette production. The DEAV-BWM model enhances the evaluation process by considering multiple criteria simultaneously and incorporating both efficiency and consensus among different evaluation methods. The key highlights of the methodology are as follows:•A novel method, called the DEAV model, for evaluating efficiency scores has been established, incorporating both Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) concepts.•This paper introduces a novel hybrid method that combines the DEAV model with the BWM to evaluate and rank biomass materials for charcoal briquette production, enhancing the reliability and robustness of the decision-making process.•The proposed method can be adapted and applied to other areas of biomass utilization and beyond, providing a versatile tool for researchers and practitioners in the field of sustainable energy, engineering, and operations research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.