ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
Behavioural impact of antibiotic stewardship in children in primary care: interviews with GPs and parents.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From adoption to implementation: paediatricians' experiences with C-reactive protein point-of-care testing in the community setting.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the implementation process of POC-CRP devices in managing adults with cough in general practice: insights from a focus group study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The ARON study, a randomized controlled trial, assesses a behavioural intervention incorporating clinically guided C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care testing and a parental information booklet to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for acutely ill children in Belgian primary care. Objectives: To explore GP and parent views and experiences regarding the ARON trial intervention. Methods: We conducted a qualitative embedded process evaluation in Belgian general practice. Semi-structured interviews were held with purposively sampled GPs and a convenience sample of mothers of acutely ill children presenting to primary care. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Thirty-four interviews were conducted with 17 GPs and 17 parents from the intervention arm, and four themes were identified. The first theme centres on the supportive role of CRP point-of-care testing in reducing diagnostic uncertainty and decreasing inappropriate prescriptions. The second theme explores the use of CRP in managing perceived parental expectations of antibiotics. The third theme discusses the use of intermediate CRP levels (above the trial's 5 mg/L cut-off) as an indicator of serious infection, as opposed to its intended role in the trial as a rule-out factor. The final theme delves into the dual functionality of the booklet, enhancing self-management and offering reassurance through safety-netting advice. A logic model depicts the assumptions and (un)anticipated dynamics underlying the relationships between these themes and their subthemes. Conclusion: Both GPs and parents consider the intervention to be a helpful complementary tool during consultations for acutely ill children.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.