ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2024
Enhancing pharmacogenomic data accessibility and drug safety with large language models: a case study with Llama3.1.
Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An agentic AI system for automated pharmacogenomic recommendation generation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Realizing Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Real World Enhances Public Health.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) holds the promise of personalizing medical treatments based on individual genetic profiles, thereby enhancing drug efficacy and safety. However, the current landscape of PGx research is hindered by fragmented data sources, time-consuming manual data extraction processes, and the need for comprehensive and up-to-date information. This study aims to address these challenges by evaluating the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically Llama3.1-70B, to automate and improve the accuracy of PGx information extraction from the FDA Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labeling (FDA PGx Biomarker table), which is well-structured with drug names, biomarkers, therapeutic area, and related labeling texts. Our primary goal was to test the feasibility of LLMs in streamlining PGx data extraction, as an alternative to traditional, labor-intensive approaches. Llama3.1-70B achieved 91.4% accuracy in identifying drug-biomarker pairs from single labeling texts and 82% from mixed texts, with over 85% consistency in aligning extracted PGx categories from FDA PGx Biomarker table and relevant scientific abstracts, demonstrating its effectiveness for PGx data extraction. By integrating data from diverse sources, including scientific abstracts, this approach can support pharmacologists, regulatory bodies, and healthcare researchers in updating PGx resources more efficiently, making critical information more accessible for applications in personalized medicine. In addition, this approach shows potential of discovering novel PGx information, particularly of underrepresented minority ethnic groups. This study highlights the ability of LLMs to enhance the efficiency and completeness of PGx research, thus laying a foundation for advancements in personalized medicine by ensuring that drug therapies are tailored to the genetic profiles of diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.