ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024
Urinary microbiome profiling as a non-invasive tool for identifying biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial dysbiosis and predictive neuroactive functional profiles in paediatric neurogenic bladder: an exploratory machine learning-based approach.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Multi-omics-driven biomarker discovery in autoimmune diseases: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bacteriome alterations have been implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the relationship between SLE and the urinary microbiome remains underexplored. This study aimed to characterize the urinary microbiome of SLE patients using 16S rRNA sequencing and to investigate its correlations with clinical parameters through integrative analyses. Methods: Urine sediment samples were collected from individuals with SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) (n = 20), SLE without LN (n = 22), and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 23). DNA was extracted and subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing to profile the urinary microbiome. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of urinary microbiota, while Spearman's correlation analysis was employed to identify links between specific microbial taxa and clinical parameters. Functional predictions of bacterial roles were performed using Picrust2. Results: The urinary microbiota diagnostic model exhibited excellent performance in distinguishing SLE patients from HCs. Spearman's analysis revealed significant correlations between the urinary microbiome and clinical parameters. Specifically, Discussion: Our study is the first to reveal dysbiosis in the urinary microbiome of patients with SLE. Certain bacterial taxa in the urinary microbiome were identified as potential diagnostic biomarkers for SLE. Furthermore, the functional implications of these bacterial communities suggest their involvement in immune modulation, highlighting the potential for further investigation into their roles in SLE pathogenesis and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.