Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691694›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2024

Doubly robust estimation under covariate-induced dependent left truncation.

Yuyao Wang, Andrew Ying, Ronghui Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuyao WangDepartment of Mathematics, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Andrew YingDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 265 South 37th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0124-1856
Ronghui XuDepartment of Mathematics, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2822-0561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In prevalent cohort studies with follow-up, the time-to-event outcome is subject to left truncation leading to selection bias. For estimation of the distribution of the time to event, conventional methods adjusting for left truncation tend to rely on the quasi-independence assumption that the truncation time and the event time are independent on the observed region. This assumption is violated when there is dependence between the truncation time and the event time, possibly induced by measured covariates. Inverse probability of truncation weighting can be used in this case, but it is sensitive to misspecification of the truncation model. In this work, we apply semiparametric theory to find the efficient influence curve of the expectation of an arbitrarily transformed survival time in the presence of covariate-induced dependent left truncation. We then use it to construct estimators that are shown to enjoy double-robustness properties. Our work represents the first attempt to construct doubly robust estimators in the presence of left truncation, which does not fall under the established framework of coarsened data where doubly robust approaches were developed. We provide technical conditions for the asymptotic properties that appear to not have been carefully examined in the literature for time-to-event data, and study the estimators via extensive simulation. We apply the estimators to two datasets from practice, with different right-censoring patterns.

Indexed as

Conditional quasi-independenceEfficient influence curveMachine learningRate doubly robustSelection biasSemiparametric theory

Identifiers

PMID39691694
PMCPMC11648126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.