Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691693›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2024

Regression analysis of group-tested current status data.

Shuwei Li, Tao Hu, Lianming Wang, Christopher S McMahan, Joshua M Tebbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuwei LiSchool of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Daxuecheng Road 230, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China.
Tao HuSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4463-004X
Lianming WangDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, 209A LeConte College, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.
Christopher S McMahanSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Martin Hall, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.
Joshua M TebbsDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, 217 LeConte College, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-7241

Funding

Group testing for infectious disease detection: multiplex assays and back-end screeningR01AI121351 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BILDER, CHRISTOPHER R · 2016 to 2025
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group testing is an effective way to reduce the time and cost associated with conducting large-scale screening for infectious diseases. Benefits are realized through testing pools formed by combining specimens, such as blood or urine, from different individuals. In some studies, individuals are assessed only once and a time-to-event endpoint is recorded, for example, the time until infection. Combining group testing with this type of endpoint results in group-tested current status data (Petito & Jewell, 2016). To analyse these complex data, we propose methods that estimate a proportional hazard regression model based on test outcomes from measuring the pools. A sieve maximum likelihood estimation approach is developed that approximates the cumulative baseline hazard function with a piecewise constant function. To identify the sieve estimator, a computationally efficient expectation-maximization algorithm is derived by using data augmentation. Asymptotic properties of both the parametric and nonparametric components of the sieve estimator are then established by applying modern empirical process theory. Numerical results from simulation studies show that our proposed method performs nominally and has advantages over the corresponding estimation method based on individual testing results. We illustrate our work by analysing a chlamydia dataset collected by the State Hygienic Laboratory at the University of Iowa.

Indexed as

Cox proportional hazards modelDiagnostic testingGroup testingMaximum likelihoodMisclassificationSieve estimator

Identifiers

PMID39691693
PMCPMC11648127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.