Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691661›Full record

ArticleCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2024

Interlimb and Intralimb Synergy Modeling for Lower Limb Assistive Devices: Modeling Methods and Feature Selection.

Fengyan Liang, Lifen Mo, Yiou Sun, Cheng Guo, Fei Gao, Wei-Hsin Liao, Junyi Cao, Binbin Li, Zhenhua Song, Dong Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fengyan LiangState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Sanya, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1491-8221
Lifen MoState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Sanya, China.
Yiou SunState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Sanya, China.
Cheng GuoState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Sanya, China.
Fei GaoShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Wei-Hsin LiaoDepartment of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China.
Junyi CaoKey Laboratory of Education Ministry for Modern Design and Rotor-Bearing System, School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an, China.
Binbin LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, China.
Zhenhua SongDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, China.
Dong WangState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Sanya, China.
Ming YinState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Hainan University, Sanya, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of gait synergy provides novel human-machine interfaces and has been applied to the control of lower limb assistive devices, such as powered prostheses and exoskeletons. Specifically, on the basis of gait synergy, the assistive device can generate/predict the appropriate reference trajectories precisely for the affected or missing parts from the motions of sound parts of the patients. Optimal modeling for gait synergy methods that involves optimal combinations of features (inputs) is required to achieve synergic trajectories that improve human-machine interaction. However, previous studies lack thorough discussions on the optimal methods for synergy modeling. In addition, feature selection (FS) that is crucial for reducing data dimensionality and improving modeling quality has often been neglected in previous studies. Here, we comprehensively investigated modeling methods and FS using 4 up-to-date neural networks: sequence-to-sequence (Seq2Seq), long short-term memory (LSTM), recurrent neural network (RNN), and gated recurrent unit (GRU). We also conducted complete FS using 3 commonly used methods: random forest, information gain, and Pearson correlation. Our findings reveal that Seq2Seq (mean absolute error: 0.404° and 0.596°, respectively) outperforms LSTM, RNN, and GRU for both interlimb and intralimb synergy modeling. Furthermore, FS is proven to significantly improve Seq2Seq's modeling performance (

Identifiers

PMID39691661
PMCPMC11651417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.