ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Does hand dominance influence clinical outcomes and implant survival in shoulder arthroplasty?
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does upper limb dominance influence outcomes in adults undergoing primary anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a successful treatment method for patients with end-stage glenohumeral osteoarthritis and different factors influencing the clinical outcome have been determined. However, the role of hand dominance on the postoperative clinical results and implant survival is not well analyzed. Hypothesis: Hand Dominance does not influence the outcome after TSA. Patients and methods: In this single center cohort study, 138 consecutive patients with primary Osteoarthritis (OA)were treated with a TSA and evaluated with a mean follow-up of 45 months (range 24-158 months). 62.32 % (86 patients) underwent TSA on the dominant side (DOM group) and 37.68 % (52 patients) on their non-dominant side (NON-DOM group). For clinical evaluation the adjusted Constant-Murley (CS) score, pain (Numeric analog scale (NAS)), subjective satisfaction and range of motion (ROM) were recorded. Furthermore, survivorship analysis was performed for the endpoint revision for any reason. Results: Both dominant (DOM) and non-dominant (NON-DOM) groups demonstrated significant improvement in all clinical outcomes from pre-to postoperative (p < 0.0001) with no between-group differences (p > 0.05). Implant survival was 98.8 % at 123 months (DOM) and 90 % at 158 months (NON-DOM) (p = 0.89). Conclusion: Hand dominance did not influence postoperative outcomes, survivorship, or age at time of surgery. Patients can expect excellent results after TSA regardless of their predominant dexterity. Level of evidence: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.