Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691608›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2024

Nutritional value of common carbohydrate sources used in pet foods.

Hyun-Woo Cho, Kangmin Seo, Min Young Lee, Sang-Yeob Lee, Kyoung-Min So, Ki Hyun Kim, Ju Lan Chun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyun-Woo ChoAnimal Welfare Research Team, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-9952
Kangmin SeoAnimal Welfare Research Team, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-8536
Min Young LeeAnimal Welfare Research Team, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4860-6290
Sang-Yeob LeeAnimal Welfare Research Team, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8024-1135
Kyoung-Min SoAnimal Welfare Research Team, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9497-3345
Ki Hyun KimAcademic-Industrial Cooperation Organization, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-2126
Ju Lan ChunAnimal Welfare Research Team, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4618-586X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet digestibility can vary based on factors such as the type of ingredients, processing techniques, formulation, fiber content, and nutrient interactions. Unlike proteins and fats, there is no specific carbohydrate requirement, which typically constitutes 30%-60% of commercial dried dog foods. Because of the significant proportion of carbohydrates in dog food, this study aimed to evaluate the differences in nutrient digestibility among barley, brown rice, corn, mung bean, and rice, which are common carbohydrate sources in commercial dog foods. All experimental diets had consistent chemical compositions. The digestibility of each carbohydrate source was evaluated using the total feces collection method in four castrated male and four neutered female beagles with an average age of 4.58 ± 0.14 years. The average daily dry matter intake of the five experimental diets was 203.0 ± 3.23 g/day. The percentage of dry matter digestibility of the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) was the highest for rice and corn at 92.45% and 92.95%, respectively, followed by brown rice (91.61%), barley (88.81%), and mung beans (80.74%). The percentage of nitrogen-free extract digestibility was also high for rice, corn, and brown rice at 97.08%, 96.14%, and 95.56%, respectively, followed by barley at 90.10% and mung bean at 83.38%. Amino acid digestibility analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between rice, corn, brown rice, and barley, except for methionine, which is an essential amino acid. Although the ATTD and amino acid profile of the mung bean-based diet were less efficient than those of the other test diets, the overall digestibility was satisfactory and there were no significant differences in palatability. The differences in digestibility observed in mung bean-based diets compared to other grain-based diets can be attributed to variations in the starch and fiber content of the raw materials. By leveraging these characteristics, mung bean-based diets may offer strategic benefits for glycemic control and weight management in dogs. Our results may serve as a basis for formulating appropriate diets for dogs.

Indexed as

CarbohydratesDietsDigestibilityDogsNutrient interactions

Identifiers

PMID39691608
PMCPMC11647412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.