Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691584›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and treatment2023

HIV Care Preferences among Young People Living with HIV in Lesotho: A Secondary Data Analysis of the PEBRA Cluster Randomized Trial.

Olivia Seiler, Mathebe Kopo, Mpho Kao, Thabo Ishmael Lejone, Nadine Tschumi, Tracy Renée Glass, Jennifer Anne Brown, Niklaus Daniel Labhardt, Alain Amstutz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03969030 (Peer-Educator-coordinated vs Nurse-coordinated ART Refill for Adolescents and Young Adults Living With HIV in Lesotho - a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03969030 nacompletednot on this map

Peer-Educator-coordinated vs Nurse-coordinated ART Refill for Adolescents and Young Adults Living With HIV in Lesotho - a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial (PEBRA Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmstutz AlainRan2019 to 2021Enrolled307ConditionsHIV/AIDSArmsPEBRA model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Olivia SeilerUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-5249
Mathebe KopoSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Mpho KaoSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Thabo Ishmael LejoneSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1724-1532
Nadine TschumiDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-9542
Tracy Renée GlassUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jennifer Anne BrownDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1874-6153
Niklaus Daniel LabhardtDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3599-1791
Alain AmstutzDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1716-993X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sub-Saharan Africa is home to 89% of all young people living with HIV, a key population with specific challenges and needs. In-depth knowledge of service demands is needed to tailor and differentiate service delivery for this group. We evaluated HIV care preferences among young people living with HIV who were part of the PEBRA (Peer Educator Based Refill of ART) cluster-randomized trial. Methods: The PEBRA trial evaluated a novel model of care at 20 health facilities in Lesotho, Southern Africa. In the PEBRA model, a peer educator regularly assessed participant preferences regarding antiretroviral therapy (ART) refill location, SMS notifications (for adherence, drug refill, viral load), and general care support options and delivered services accordingly over a 12-month period. We present these preferences and their changes over time. Results: At enrolment, 41 of 123 (33.3%) chose ART refill outside the health facility, compared to 8 of 123 (6.5%) after 12 months. Among those selecting clinic-based ART refill, many preferred collecting ART during the peer educator led Saturday clinic club, 45 of 123 (36.5%) at the beginning and 55 of 123 (44.7%) at the end. SMS reminders for treatment adherence and ART refill visits were chosen by 51 of 123 (41.5%) at enrolment and 54 of 123 (44.7%) at the last assessment. Support by the peer educator was popular at the beginning (110 of 123 (89.4%)) and lower but still high at the end (85 of 123 (69.1%)). Thirteen of 123 (10.6%) participants chose support by the nurse, without the involvement of any peer educator, at the first and 21 of 123 (17.1%) at the last assessment. Conclusion: Our longitudinal preference assessment among young people living with HIV in Lesotho showed a sustained interest in SMS notifications for adherence and refill visits as well as in additional support by a peer educator. ART refill outside the health facility was not as popular as expected; instead, medication pick-up at the facility, especially during Saturday clinic clubs, was favoured. The PEBRA trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03969030. Registered on 31 May 2019).

Identifiers

PMID39691584
PMCPMC11651754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.