Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691569›Full record

ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2024

Structural Comparison of Hydroxyapatite from Clam Shell Waste and Eggshell Waste Compared to Commercial Synthetic Hydroxyapatite.

M Idulhaq, A Mudigdo, P Utomo, B Wasita, M E Trapsilantya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M IdulhaqDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.
A MudigdoDepartment of Pathology Anatomy, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.
P UtomoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.
B WasitaDepartment of Pathology Anatomy, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.
M E TrapsilantyaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study compares the quality of hydroxyapatite in Anadara granosa waste and laying chicken eggshell waste to commercial synthetic hydroxyapatite. Material and Methods: This experimental research included 27 samples of hydroxyapatite derived from clam shell waste (CSW-HAP), hydroxyapatite derived from eggshell waste (ESW-HAP), and commercial synthetic hydroxyapatite, with nine samples of each. The calcination method was used to process clam shell waste and eggshell waste into hydroxyapatite, which was then compared with synthetic hydroxyapatite from Bongros® for calcium and phosphate content. Scanning electron microscopy was used to compare their morphological structures. Result: The mean calcium levels in the CW-HAP, EW-HAP, and control groups were 41.3±2.9%, 41.5±2.3%, and 39.6±5.0%, respectively. According to One Way ANOVA, there was no significant difference between the CW-HAP or EW-HAP groups and the control group (p=0.49). The mean phosphate levels in the CW-HAP, EW-HAP, and control groups were 8.1±1.2%, 8.1±1.3%, and 9.4±2.0%, respectively. The results were also not significant (p=0.146). Conclusion: Clam shell waste and eggshells can be an alternative source of hydroxyapatite substitution, as demonstrated by the structural and porous formation of hydroxyapatite obtained from these sources (CW-HAP and EW-HAP) when compared to commercial synthetic hydroxyapatite.

Indexed as

biomaterialbone repairclam shelleggshellhydroxyapatite

Identifiers

PMID39691569
PMCPMC11647544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.