ArticleHealth science reports2024
Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Compared to Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair in a Military Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modern Perspectives on Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Narrative Review on Surgical Techniques, Mesh Selection and Fixation Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inguinal hernias are encountered commonly, but there is a lack of uniformity and standardization in repair techniques. There are a variety of repair methods, from open methods to laparoscopic approaches. The available laparoscopic techniques that exist for inguinal hernia repair are transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. This study aims to compare the outcomes of these two laparoscopic procedures. Methods: The study was initiated after receiving ethical clearance. This single-centric retrospective study included the patients that underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023. Patient records were reviewed and assessed against the inclusion criteria of the study. Systematic random sampling was applied to select patients from the records. A structured questionnaire was prepared for the purpose of data collection. The data were refined and analyzed using the SPSS software. Results: A total of 200 patients (100 in each group) who underwent laparoscopic repair of an inguinal hernia were part of this study. The median (IQR) age of patients in the TAPP group was 50 (41.25-64.75) years, and that in the TEP group was 48.5 (39.25-64.75) years. The TAPP procedure took a median (IQR) time of 81 (77-88) min, while the TEP procedure took 69 (66-73) min to finish. The patients in the TAPP group returned to their normal activities after 15 (14-16) days of surgery, and the patients in the TEP group returned after 13 (11-14) days. The pain score at 1 week was found to be better in the TEP group. No difference was observed in complications or recurrence. Conclusion: TEP repair was found to be superior to TAPP repair in terms of procedural time, return to normal activities, and pain score at 1 week.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.