ArticleLeukemia research reports2025
Treatment of Vietnamese patients diagnosed with myelodysplastic neoplasms: Practical experience in a developing country.
Article in Leukemia research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treatment of patients diagnosed with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) is difficult and the outcome is still limited, especially in developing countries. We conducted this study in order to share some experience in treating patients diagnosed with MDS in developing countries. Methods: This was a retrospective study that included 32 patients with newly MDS. 13 lower-risk patients, including 2 patients with MDS 5q- were treated with erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA). 19 patients with higher risk were treated with hypomethylating agent (HMA), which was decitabine. Results: In the ESA treatment group, the rate of hematologic improvement-erythroid was 69.2 %, the rate of total hematologic improvement (with 3 lineages improvement) was 61.5 %. In the HMA treatment group, the overall response rate was 52.6 %. The follow-up times were 42 months. The overall survival (OS), leukemic transformation-free survival (LFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the ESA treatment group were 30.44, 28.91, and 28.29 months; respectively. The OS, LFS, and PFS of the HMA treatment group were 34.27, 31.45, and 26.83 months; respectively Conclusions: Patients with lower risk MDS, including MDS 5q-, may benefit from treatment with erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA). Patients with higher risk MDS may have a favorable outcome with decitabine (HMA) treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.