Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691447›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Applying an evolutionary perspective to assisted reproductive technologies.

Jonathan P Evans, Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan P EvansCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009 WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2603-6832
Francisco Garcia-GonzalezCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009 WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9515-9038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are commonly used to address human infertility and to boost livestock production. During ART, procedures such as in vitro fertilization, artificial insemination, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection introduce gametes and embryos to unnatural and potentially stressful conditions that can influence offspring health, often via epigenetic effects. In this perspective we summarize these key risks of ART for embryonic and longer-term offspring fitness, emphasizing the need for experimental research on animal models to determine causal links between ART and offspring fitness across multiple generations. We also highlight how ART can bypass a range of naturally and sexually selected mechanisms that occur in the female reproductive tract and/or via female secretions that ultimately determine which sperm fertilize their eggs. We further argue that this curtailment of female-modulated mechanisms of sperm selection may have important consequences for ART-conceived offspring. We encourage the development of ART methods that better mimic natural processes of sperm selection and embrace the fundamental principles of natural and sexual selection. Ultimately, the aim of this perspective is to encourage dialogue between the fields of evolutionary biology and applied areas of animal and human reproduction.

Indexed as

assisted reproductioncryptic female choicehaploid selectioninfertilityoffspring health

Identifiers

PMID39691447
PMCPMC11650523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.