Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691412›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Novel Urological Application of Hyaluronic Acid/Alginate Sheet to Prevent Adhesion Formation: A Technique Guide and Case Series.

Dung Pham, Bryan Pham, Mitchell K Ng

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dung PhamUrology, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, USA.
Bryan PhamUrology, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, USA.
Mitchell K NgOrthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue gliding and mobility are paramount to the success of penile procedures. While postoperative healing is intended to protect, repair, and nourish injured tissues, an overzealous response often leaves painful and debilitating tethering between the corpora, including nerves, and surrounding tissues. This tethering interferes with the intended outcomes of surgery by preventing necessary gliding. An ideal implant that serves as a tissue gliding companion would be an easy-to-apply, temporary gliding surface that prevents unwanted tethering, bioresorbs completely, and flexibly addresses tissues that significantly contract postoperatively. Unfortunately, most commercially available options are difficult to use intra-operatively, are not designed to reduce friction, have variable efficacy, and have incomplete bioresorption. A promising new technology is a hydrogel made from alginate and hyaluronic acid (HA). Application of this hydrogel is revolutionizing orthopedic hand surgery, spine surgery, sports injury repair, and foot and ankle surgery with placement of gel/sheets around a range of soft tissue environments (joints, tendons, ligaments, peripheral nerves, vasculature) without issue. We present a case series of four patients undergoing various urologic procedures with the application of this novel bioresorbable hydrogel and their associated excellent clinical outcomes with no adverse events. We also discuss potential urologic indications for the use of this bioresorbable hydrogel along with technical intra-operative considerations.

Indexed as

chordeehidden penishydrogelorchiopexysurgical adhesionsurology

Identifiers

PMID39691412
PMCPMC11650429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.