ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Coptisine enhances the sensitivity of chemoresistant breast cancer cells by inhibiting the function and expression of ABC transporters.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multidrug resistance (MDR), mainly caused by ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABCTs) efflux, makes it difficult for many anticancer drugs to treat breast cancer (BC). Phytochemicals can reverse cancer's MDR by modifying ABC transporter expression and function, as well as working synergistically with anticancer drugs to target other molecules. The reversal effect of the isoquinoline alkaloid coptisine (COP) was assessed on four breast cell lines; Two sensitive MCF-7 cell lines with positive estrogen, androgen, progesterone, and glucocorticoid receptors, as well as MDB-MB-231 cells with negative estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors, and two doxorubicin-resistant cell lines, MCF-7/ADR and MDB-MB-231/ADR. Methods: The cytotoxicity of COP and its ability to improve doxorubicin (DOX) cytotoxicity were assessed using the MTT assay. The effectiveness of COP in reversing DOX resistance was evaluated by calculating resistance ratio (RR) values, combination index (CI), and isobologram (IB). The inhibitory effect of COP on ABCT efflux function in comparison to verapamil (VER) was evaluated by measuring the cellular accumulation of Rho123 using flow cytometry. The impact of COP, either alone or in combination with DOX, on the gene expression of ABCTs (P-gp/MDR1, BCRP, and MRP1) of investigated cell lines was assessed by RT-PCR. Results: The COP showed modest cytotoxicity on the examined cell lines. In MCF-7/ADR and MDA-MB-231/ADR cells, COP (31 μM) enhanced DOX cytotoxicity with CI (0.77 and 0.75), RR (2.58 and 3.33), and IB suggesting synergism. COP significantly inhibits ABCT function in resistant BC cell lines, increases Rho123 accumulation, and decreases efflux more than VER; 2.1 and 1.2-fold, respectively. The combination of COP and DOX had a strong inhibitory effect on ABCT function (3.1 and 3.9 times VER, P< 0.001) and downregulated the genes and protein expression of ABCT. Conclusion: COP reversed ABCT-mediated multidrug resistance
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.