Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691363›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Breast-Conserving Surgery with Immediate Partial Breast Reconstruction by Using Pedicled Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap: A 7-Year Follow-Up of 50 Women.

Xing Wang, Ling Huo, Yingjian He, Jinfeng Li, Tianfeng Wang, Zhaoqing Fan, Tao Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xing WangBreast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Ling HuoBreast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Yingjian HeBreast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Jinfeng LiBreast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Tianfeng WangBreast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Zhaoqing FanBreast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Tao OuyangBreast Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap has been used for more than 10 years in the immediate partial breast reconstruction (IPBR) of breast cancer, allowing many patients to maximize reserved autologous breast tissue who do not have indications for breast-conserving surgery (BCS). No large sample size survival data for this operation have been reported worldwide. Methods: There are 212 primary breast cancer patients who were prepared to receive BCS with IPBR of pedicled TDAP flaps in our institution from June 2013 to December 2017. Finally, the operations were completed successfully in 50 cases. All patients were female with a median age of 40 years. Results: The average diameter of TDAPs measured by Doppler ultrasound before the operation was 1.8 ± 0.6 mm (ranging from 0.6 to 3.3 mm). The average size of the flaps was 15 × 6 cm. The average time of operations was 282 ± 71 min (ranging from 120 to 425 min). The drainage tube was removed 4.8 ± 1.9 days after the operation (ranging from 3 to 12 days). All TDAP flaps survived, and the wound complication rate was 4% (2/50). The median follow-up time was 88 (67, 94) months (M [IQR]), with a 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rate of 4% (95% CI: 0.1-9.5%), a 5-year breast cancer-free interval of 88.0% (95% CI: 79.0-97.0%), and a 5-year overall survival rate of 96.0% (95% CI: 90.5-99.9%). Conclusion: IPBR using pedicled TDAP flaps is a good choice for repairing local breast defects in BCS. The advantages of this surgery are no influence on latissimus dorsi function, few complications in the donor area, and good long-term prognosis.

Indexed as

Breast-conserving surgeryImmediate partial breast reconstructionIpsilateral breast tumor recurrenceThoracodorsal artery perforator flap

Identifiers

PMID39691363
PMCPMC11649294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.