ArticleTexas Heart Institute journal
Correlation Between Lipoprotein(a) and Prognosis for Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in Texas Heart Institute journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The value of miRNA-29b in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and the evaluation of cardiac function after myocardial infarction.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a risk factor for first atherosclerotic thrombosis events, but the role of elevated Lp(a) in secondary prevention is controversial. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the influence of elevated Lp(a) levels on the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: The team collected and compared clinical information of patients hospitalized during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study used a multivariate logistic regression model to evaluate the relationships between Lp(a) levels, cardiovascular risk factors, and the prognosis of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing PCI. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between patients grouped according to Lp(a) level in terms of sex; age; body mass index and obesity; hyperuricemia; smoking; cardiac insufficiency; acute myocardial infarction; multivessel lesion; in-stent restenosis; secondary PCI; apolipoprotein AI level; incidence of high total cholesterol or high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; or family history of hypertension, diabetes, or coronary artery disease. The average Lp(a) concentration did not statistically significantly decrease after 1 year of statin treatment after PCI. One year after patients began statins, there were no significant differences between Lp(a) groups in the incidence of high triglycerides ( Conclusion: Sustained high concentrations of Lp(a) did not significantly increase the incidence of in-stent restenosis or secondary PCI in patients who underwent coronary angiography 1 year after PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.