ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung and Abdominal Ultrasound for Tuberculosis in a German Multicenter Cohort of Patients With Presumed Tuberculosis Disease.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Lung and abdominal ultrasound accuracy for tuberculosis: An Indian prospective cohort study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is limited evidence on point-of-care ultrasound for tuberculosis (TB), but studies suggest high sensitivity, especially for lung ultrasound (LUS). However, insufficient data are available on specificity of the examination and its generalizability to a broader patient population. Aims: Our study aimed to establish accuracy for lung, chest, and abdominal ultrasound, individually and in combination, for TB diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study among consecutive adult out- and inpatients with probable TB in three German referral hospitals. We applied a comprehensive standardized ultrasound protocol. TB diagnosis was established by a microbiological reference standard including polymerase chain reaction and culture. Results: A total of 102 participants originating from 30 different countries were enrolled. HIV prevalence was 7/99 (7%) and 73/102 (72%) had confirmed TB. TB was limited to the lungs in 15/34 (44%) of refugees and 27/39 (69%) in nonrefugees. Focused assessment with sonography for HIV-associated tuberculosis had a sensitivity of 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-52) and specificity of 55% (95% CI, 38-72). Additional findings, such as small subpleural consolidations on LUS had a high sensitivity (88%; 95% CI, 78-93), but a low specificity (17%; 95% CI, 8-35). Larger consolidations in the lung apices had a sensitivity of 19% (95% CI, 12-30) and a specificity of 97% (95% CI, 83-100). Conclusions: Our study establishes the first data on LUS performance against a comprehensive reference standard. Overall, our data suggest that ultrasound does not meet the requirements for triage but previously described and novel ultrasound targets in combination could aid in the clinical decision making.Registry: DRKS00026636.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.