Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691280›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy2024

Artificial intelligence for chimeric antigen receptor-based therapies: a comprehensive review of current applications and future perspectives.

Muqadas Shahzadi, Hamad Rafique, Ahmad Waheed, Hina Naz, Atifa Waheed, Feruza Ravshanovna Zokirova, Humera Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muqadas ShahzadiDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5253-1405
Hamad RafiqueCollege of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-9109
Ahmad WaheedDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Okara, 2 KM Lahore Road, Renala Khurd, Okara 56130, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5810-3369
Hina NazDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-398X
Atifa WaheedDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5382-7765
Feruza Ravshanovna ZokirovaDepartment of Information Technologies, Tashkent State Technical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6882-7805
Humera KhanDepartment of Biochemistry, Sahiwal Medical College, Sahiwal, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies' design, production, and delivery is a novel and promising approach. This review provides an overview of the current applications and challenges of AI for CAR-based therapies and suggests some directions for future research and development. This paper examines some of the recent advances of AI for CAR-based therapies, for example, using deep learning (DL) to design CARs that target multiple antigens and avoid antigen escape; using natural language processing to extract relevant information from clinical reports and literature; using computer vision to analyze the morphology and phenotype of CAR cells; using reinforcement learning to optimize the dose and schedule of CAR infusion; and using AI to predict the efficacy and toxicity of CAR-based therapies. These applications demonstrate the potential of AI to improve the quality and efficiency of CAR-based therapies and to provide personalized and precise treatments for cancer patients. However, there are also some challenges and limitations of using AI for CAR-based therapies, for example, the lack of high-quality and standardized data; the need for validation and verification of AI models; the risk of bias and error in AI outputs; the ethical, legal, and social issues of using AI for health care; and the possible impact of AI on the human role and responsibility in cancer immunotherapy. It is important to establish a multidisciplinary collaboration among researchers, clinicians, regulators, and patients to address these challenges and to ensure the safe and responsible use of AI for CAR-based therapies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancer immunotherapyCAR-based therapiespredictive biomarkerstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39691280
PMCPMC11650588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.