Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691199›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Healthcare workers' knowledge and attitudes regarding artificial intelligence adoption in healthcare: A cross-sectional study.

Moustaq Karim Khan Rony, Khadiza Akter, Latifun Nesa, Md Tawhidul Islam, Fateha Tuj Johra, Fazila Akter, Muhammad Join Uddin, Jeni Begum, Md Abdun Noor, Sumon Ahmad and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Moustaq Karim Khan RonyMaster of Public Health, Bangladesh Open University, Gazipur, Bangladesh.
Khadiza AkterMaster of Public Health, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Latifun NesaMaster's of Child Health Nursing, National Institute of Advanced Nursing Education and Research Mugda, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Tawhidul IslamLecturer, North East Nursing College, Sylhet, Bangladesh.
Fateha Tuj JohraMasters in Disaster Management, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Fazila AkterDhaka Nursing College, Affiliated with the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Muhammad Join UddinMaster of Public Health, RTM Al-Kabir Technical University, Sylhet, Bangladesh.
Jeni BegumMaster of Public Health, Leading University, Sylhet, Bangladesh.
Md Abdun NoorSchool of Medical Sciences, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh.
Sumon AhmadMaster of Public Health, Leading University, Sylhet, Bangladesh.
Sabren Mukta TanhaMaster of Public Health, Leading University, Sylhet, Bangladesh.
Most Tahmina KhatunMaster of Public Health, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shuvashish Das BalaAssociate Professor, College of Nursing, International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mst Rina ParvinSchool of Medical Sciences, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The convergence of healthcare and artificial intelligence (AI) introduces a transformative era in medical practice. However, the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare workers concerning the adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare are currently unknown. Aims: The primary objective was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Dhaka city, Bangladesh, regarding the adoption of AI in healthcare. Methods: A cross-sectional research design was employed, incorporating a dual-method approach to select participants using randomness and convenience sampling techniques. Validity was ensured through a literature review, content validity, and reliability assessment (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85), and exploratory factor analysis identified robust underlying factors. Data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics, including Fisher's exact tests, multivariate logistic regression, and Pearson correlation analysis, conducted using STATA software, providing a comprehensive understanding of healthcare workers' AI adoption in healthcare. Results: This study revealed that age was a significant factor, with individuals aged 18-25 and 26-35 having higher odds of good knowledge and positive attitudes (AOR 1.56, 95 % CI 1.12-2.43; AOR 1.42, 95 % CI 0.98-2.34). Physicians (AOR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.78-1.89), hospital workers (AOR 1.29, 95 % CI 0.92-2.09), and full-time employees (AOR 1.45, 95 % CI 1.12-2.34) exhibited higher odds. Attending AI conferences (AOR 1.27, 95 % CI 0.92-2.23) and learning through research articles/journals (AOR 1.31, 95 % CI 0.98-2.09) were positively associated with good knowledge and positive attitudes. This research also emphasized the strong correlations between knowledge and positive attitudes (r = 0.89, P < 0.001), as well as negative attitudes with poor knowledge (r = 0.65, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The study highlights the critical need for targeted educational interventions to bridge the knowledge gaps among healthcare professionals regarding AI adoption. The findings reveal that younger healthcare workers, those in full-time employment, and individuals with exposure to AI through conferences or research are more likely to possess good knowledge and hold positive attitudes towards AI integration. These results suggest that policies and training programs must be tailored to address specific demographic differences, ensuring that all groups are equipped to engage with AI technologies. Moreover, the study emphasizes the importance of continuous professional development, which could foster a workforce capable of harnessing AI's potential to improve patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAttitudeHealthcare workersKnowledgeMedical practiceTechnology

Identifiers

PMID39691199
PMCPMC11650294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.