Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691185›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in rare disease

Advancing rare disease measurement through the Rare Disease Clinical Outcome Assessment Consortium.

Naomi Knoble, Lindsey T Murray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in rare disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naomi KnobleDivision of Clinical Outcome Assessment, Office of Drug Evaluation Science, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Lindsey T MurrayCritical Path Institute, 1840 East River Road, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85718, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9168-2179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a significant unmet need to develop and evaluate new treatments for people living with one of approximately 8000 rare diseases. Well-known difficulties in conducting clinical trials (e.g., small samples, wide geographic distribution, heterogeneous symptoms) and developing products for these rare indications persist. Identifying outcomes in rare disease clinical trials remains a hurdle that contributes to the challenges for drug and gene therapy development due to uncertainty about what aspects of a condition to measure for safety and efficacy and often with no regulatory approval precedent. To accelerate rare disease treatments by advancing outcomes measurement, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) funded a cooperative agreement to establish the Rare Disease COA Consortium (RD-COAC) in 2019. The RD-COAC officially launched on January 1, 2022, with the mission to enable pre-competitive, multi-stakeholder collaboration aimed at identifying scientifically sound tools and methodologies for collecting clinically meaningful and patient-centric outcomes data in treatment trials for rare diseases. The RD-COAC has four complementary workstreams to advance COA measurement for rare disease clinical trials: (1) Rare Disease COA Resource; (2) Advancing COA Measurement Topic-Focused Working Groups; (3) Rare Disease Discussion Sessions for pre-competitive collaboration and shared learnings among RD-COAC members; and (4) Dissemination. This review provides an overview of the RD-COAC's activities to date, as well as future directions and opportunities to collaborate.

Indexed as

clinical outcome assessmentsCOAspre-competitive multi-stakeholder consortiumrare diseaseRare Disease COA Resource

Identifiers

PMID39691185
PMCPMC11650465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.