ArticleCureus2024
A Rare Case of Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm Presenting As Mucinous Vaginal Discharge.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) are rare tumors that often present with non-specific symptoms, posing diagnostic challenges. This report aims to emphasize the importance of considering AMNs in the differential diagnosis of atypical pelvic symptoms, especially when initial evaluations suggest gynecological issues. A 56-year-old female with a past medical history of hyperlipidemia and a total vaginal hysterectomy performed over 20 years prior for abnormal uterine bleeding due to fibroids presented to her gynecologist with a three-week history of vaginal discharge and pelvic pain. Initial gynecological assessments were unremarkable, prompting a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis, which revealed a markedly dilated, fluid-filled appendix, indicative of a mucinous neoplasm. The patient underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, which confirmed a low-grade AMN with clear margins. Post-surgical follow-up showed no recurrence, and a surveillance colonoscopy one year later revealed a benign tubular adenoma. This case highlights the need to consider AMNs in the differential diagnosis of pelvic symptoms, particularly when initial gynecological evaluations do not identify a clear cause. AMNs can present with symptoms that overlap with those of gynecological conditions, making accurate diagnosis challenging. Effective management through early recognition and surgical intervention is important to prevent complications. This report demonstrates the value of comprehensive diagnostic evaluation and the importance of including rare tumors in the differential diagnosis of atypical pelvic symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.