ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Irrigation Regimens With and Without Ultrasonic Activation on Root Dentin Microhardness: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The structural properties of dentin, including its microhardness, can be affected by exposure to endodontic irrigating solutions and ultrasonic activation. Aim The current study aimed to assess the effect of three different irrigation regimens, with and without ultrasonic activation, on the microhardness of the dentin. Methodology The research was conducted on 120 mandibular premolars randomly divided into four groups (n=30) based on the irrigation regimen, with each group further divided into two subgroups (n=15). Subgroups 'a" were subjected to respective irrigation regimens without ultrasonic activation. Subgroups 'b' were subjected to ultrasonic activation. The Vickers microhardness test was conducted on the samples, and the data underwent statistical analysis using the independent sample t-test, ANOVA, and the Tukey test. Results The observations of the study unveiled that the microhardness of the root dentin was decreased by all the irrigation regimens. Microhardness values of dentin showed higher reduction with ultrasonic activation than without ultrasonic for all groups. Conclusions The dentin microhardness was significantly reduced when 3% and 5% sodium hypochlorite were used with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as irrigation solutions. Ultrasonic activation of the irrigants had an adverse effect on the microhardness of dentin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.